parking tickets

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Are you a NYC parking ticket Guru? New Quiz (5-14-12)

"Larry's Blog" is now available on your Kindle!

nypt-amazon-com-logo-fancier-150
Simply "Click" on the image above.

Follow Larry

ALPHABETICAL INDEX TO LARRY'S BLOG

Larry's Blog

Loading

Larry's Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

NY Times Coverage of Alt. Side Parking Rule City Council Meeting

 

Joint session of the NYC Council's alternate side parking ruleTransportation Committee and Sanitation and Solid Waste Committee

Here's a terrific article by Noah Rosenberg, reporter for the NY Times, about yesterday's life changing for the better of the NYC driving public, meeting. I  testified in favor of these wonderful three Bills, and will publish a blog article tomorrow about my impressions.

Here's Noah...

November 9, 2010, 5:05 pm

alt.side parking rulesAn Alternative to Alternate-Side Parking Rules

Every New Yorker has seen them or been one of them: motorists napping in cars idling in the street, or maybe knitting a sweater or reading “Moby Dick” while waiting for the alternate-side parking prohibition to end.

For more than 50 years, street sweeping has been a necessary evil of life in New York City, and residents must grudgingly obey the related parking restrictions, or else face an orange envelope tucked under their windshield wiper.

Now the City Council is pushing a possible solution, or at least an idea, to make the rules a little more bearable. A proposal debated at a public hearing on Tuesday would allow drivers to take up a parking spot once a street sweeper passed by. Two other bills discussed would reduce the number of days that alternate-side parking is in effect.

The joint hearing of the Council’s committees on transportation and sanitation and solid waste management prompted a large and vocal turnout of Council members from all five boroughs.

Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez, the Manhattan Democrat behind the core legislation, emphasized the time wasted by working-class people on alternate-side days. “It’s not good for the city to restrict people from being in their jobs or being with their family,” Mr. Rodriguez said.

He added that the legislation would also minimize the harmful effects of the exhaust emitted by vehicles idling and circling for a parking spot.

At the hearing, the bill received support from several Council members and individuals including livery cab advocates and a member of New York Parking Ticket, an advocacy group for motorists. But Melanie Gold, who said she moved out of New York to flee the “parking circus,” was the most impassioned proponent.

“I have made work choices based on street-cleaning rules, I have made food choices based on street-cleaning rules,” Ms. Gold said. “My entire life has often revolved around, ‘Do I have to move my car today?’” She did not say where she now lives.

John Nucatola, the director of the sanitation department’s bureau of cleaning and collection, which schedules 46,000 street cleaning routes, played the lone devil’s advocate.

Mr. Nucatola argued that maintaining clean streets is imperative to promoting a positive image of the city, preventing litter from entering the sewer system and keeping rodents at bay.

He defended his agency’s commitment to maintaining 90-minute alternate-side blocks. Allowing parking after a mechanical broom has swept would take a lot of work and resources, he said, noting that sanitation trucks occasionally return to an area after an initial sweep. Mr. Nucatola admitted, however, that those instances are rare, and said that adequate technology and good communication between his department and traffic enforcement officers could potentially allow for some version of the bill down the road.

Mr. Rodriguez said his bill had attracted support from nearly 20 of the 51 Council members, though not so far from Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker."

The winds of change...

I've got a real good feeling about this; especially after listening to the testimony at yesterday's Council session. I was very impressed with the Council Members knowledge of the issue, and passion about creating a Bill that will significantly ease the alt. side parking pain of the NYC driving public.  

More tomorrow about the three bills and the stakeholders who care most about the outcome.

If you found this article helpful, you may wish to share it with your friends. Simply click on the above social media buttons of your choice. Thanks, Larry

Comments

Not that I am personally affected by this at all, but I would like to know how exactly sanitation proposes to communicate with the rogue parking ticket warriors, to let them know which blocks they already swept. Even more so, how in the world would a parking ticket recipient defend themselves, if they got a ticket after the block was swept?
Posted @ Wednesday, November 10, 2010 8:03 PM by Josh
Josh, 
Great question. 
One that was discussed at length at yesterday's hearing. What I heard at the hearing is that Council Members on the Sanitation and Transportation Committees both feel that common ground can be reached to find a solution agreeable to all the stakeholders that will significantly eliminate the pain of ASP. 
 
The second step was to acknowledge that the technology exists to solve the challenge you raise. For example, every broom has a GPS tracking device which lets control central know where each broom is during the entire cleaning process. Central control knows exactly when a broom finishes a block.  
 
There was some discussion about relying on the sanitation police person who rides along with the broom or supervisor to be responsible for issuing tickets; since this person is right there to see if a vehicle is occupied or not. Presently, the parking ticket warriors issue about 800,000 tickets while the sanitation police issue about 200,000. I don't have to tell you how much better it will be to remove the warriors from the equation.  
 
Everyone at the meeting firmly believes that a solution to your challenge will be worked out because there is the motivation and technology to make it work.  
 
Many other ideas were discussed. 
 
I'll keep everyone posted.
Posted @ Wednesday, November 10, 2010 8:22 PM by Larry Berezin
As we all know there are still a handful of phoney tickets issued on a daily basis. For instance how parking tickets are still written for T ramps at unmarked intersections. How does the public have access to the records that proves against the ASP ticket? Maybe what they need to do is lessen the 90 minute window, and make it a 15 minute window. With a little brain work it can all be figured out. Worst case is that Sanitation misses the block and gets it the next time.
Posted @ Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:28 PM by Josh
Josh, 
You absolutely captured the attitude of the two committees working on this Bill. There is passionate consensus that changing the alt. side parking rule to significantly eliminate the driving public's pain is LONG OVERDUE.  
 
They are discussing various ideas to address the issues you raise.  
 
Your point is well taken about the phony parking tickets issued at T ramps and other instances. You will always have a gaggle of rogue warriors and judges who abuse the system. That's why we have to stay vigilant. 
 
For example, I kept after the DOT until they "officially" amended the language in the rule, and made it clear to the judges to enforce the law the way it was amended. I don't remember the last time one of our friends complained to me about a judge not dismissing such a ticket from a rogue warrior. 
 
We have to keep the pressure on our elected officials to keep the pressure on the DOF/DOT and Police Department (they supervise the warriors) to do the right thing. I promise I will do everything I can. Can we count on you? You write really well. Please let your council member know you support these 3 Bills.
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 7:29 AM by Larry Berezin
Yes, Larry. You can definitely count on me. My main speciality is in route planning. I can definitely come up with some great ideas to alleviate the pain of ASP from the driving public and if I ever had the copportunity to sit in with the powers that be then I would be able to figure out how to better prevent gridlock during rush hour. Sounds crazy, but I know I could do it.
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:36 AM by Josh
Josh, 
You're very kind. Blocking the Box is one of my major peeves. After we finish ASP, I'd love to share some ideas with you. 
 
Maybe the powers-to-be aren't that far out of reach.
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 10:16 AM by Larry Berezin
If JJ is going to be addressing the warriors union then nothing is impossible, my friend.
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 10:41 AM by Josh
Josh, 
I 100% agree! AMAZING! 
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:00 PM by Larry Berezin
Please see if somehow you can get the both of us in this meeting. I would love to hear what JJ has to say to the warriors and partiicpate, if allowed.
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 4:09 PM by Josh
Josh, 
I suggest you contact JJ. I'm not privy to the rules of engagement between the Hatfields and McCoys. 
 
Good luck. 
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:48 PM by Larry Berezin
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics