parking tickets

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

NYP parking ticket

Google Search for Larry's Blog

Loading

Larry's Radio Show

Facebook

Videos

ALPHABETICAL INDEX TO LARRY'S BLOG

Larry's Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Is it my right to face my accuser when I fight a NYC parking ticket?

Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Do I have any Constitutional rights when I fight?

We receive many questions about why basic constitutional nyc parking tickets,parking tickets,parking ticketsafeguards, such as due process and the right to confront witnesses against you, are not available to  members of the driving public when they fight NYC parking tickets. Can I subpoena witnesses on my behalf? Do I have the right to cross examine a warrior? 

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals answers these questions in a 1996 decision. A class action was initiated by a group of aggrieved members of the Chicago driving public, who fought against the lack of constitutional safeguards when fighting Chicago parking tickets. The City of Chicago issued approximately 4M parking tickets that year.

Decriminalization

Herein lies the answer. In 1987, Chicago decriminalized parking tickets, and substituted a civil penalty system. Prior to Chicago's reclassification, parking violators were entitled to criminal process. However, the right of confrontation, cross-examination and the full Monty of due process rights are not available to defendants in civil proceedings.

Under a civil system, a parking ticket is considered a sworn statement, and prima facie evidence of a violation. The officer or warrior is not required to appear at a hearing.

Why do my due process rights vanish into thin air?

Your rights do not vanish completely. The United States Supreme Court requires a risk-benefit test be applied to the due process safeguards a defendant is seeking.  The 7th Circuit presents a cogent analysis of how a risk-benefit test applies to the due process rights of parking ticket victims. In summary, the Court explains the costs involved in requiring officers and warriors to appear at hearings is far greater than the benefit derived by a defendant's ability to cross examine his/her accuser. 

Commentary

I urge you to read this decision. You will gain a much better understanding of the whys and wherefores behind the current system for fighting a NYC parking ticket. I believe it is an advantage for the driving public NOT to have an officer or warrior present at the an in-person hearing for the same reasons expressed by the Court in the Van Harken case (Click to Download the Case)

Here is what will happen, anyway, when you try to cross-examine a police officer or warrior. 

  • Question: "Do you have a recollection of the facts surrounding my NYC parking ticket?"
  • Answer:  "Nope"
  • Question: "Is there anything that I can show you to refresh your independent recollection?"
  • Answer: "Nope"
  • Question: "Why?": 
  • Answer: "Because I issue 1000's of parking tickets. How do you expect me to remember yours?"

new york parking ticket, nyc parking ticket, parking ticket rule

 

What's your opinion? We would love to hear from you.

 

 

 

 

All Posts